SNPG vs VYM
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SNPG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SNPG led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNPG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 87 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.00% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.56% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.34%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.7% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $24,690Best | $16,784 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.3% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.9 years).
SNPG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
SNPG vs VYM Performance
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF (SNPG) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNPG returned +13.56% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, SNPG is up 10.00% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, SNPG compounded at +22.34% per year against +17.22% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNPG has the edge at +26.08% annualized vs +14.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 11.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.7% for SNPG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNPG charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNPG currently yields 0.47% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
17.6% of SNPG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.3% of VYM's money is in holdings SNPG also owns.
SNPG and VYM share little of their money.
26 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in SNPG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 87 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 502 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SNPG (82.8% of the fund), and 57 for SNPG that do not appear in VYM (81.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SNPG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.29% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.76% | 1.86% | 0.10% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.63% | 1.80% | 0.17% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.35% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.10% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.19% | 0.96% | 0.23% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.25% | 0.78% | 0.47% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.11% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.02% | 0.41% | 0.61% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SNPG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNPG or VYM?
SNPG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SNPG or VYM?
Over the past year SNPG returned +13.56% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNPG annualized +26.08% vs +14.20% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SNPG or VYM?
SNPG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 11.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SNPG -21.7% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SNPG and VYM?
SNPG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SNPG and VYM?
17.6% of SNPG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.3% of VYM's is in holdings SNPG also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in SNPG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNPG or VYM?
SNPG yields 0.47% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SNPG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SNPG led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.