SNPG vs VYM
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNPG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $13M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.45% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 87 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +13.10% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.99% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.74% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SNPG vs VYM Performance
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF (SNPG) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNPG returned +22.99% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, SNPG is up 13.10% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, SNPG compounded at +23.74% per year against +18.25% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNPG has the edge at +27.93% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.7% for SNPG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNPG charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNPG currently yields 0.45% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SNPG and VYM share 24 holdings out of 619 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNPG or VYM?
SNPG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNPG or VYM?
Over the past year SNPG returned +22.99% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNPG annualized +27.93% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNPG or VYM?
SNPG has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SNPG -21.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SNPG and VYM?
SNPG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNPG and VYM?
SNPG and VYM share 24 common holdings with a 13.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 619 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNPG or VYM?
SNPG yields 0.45% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.