IVV vs TGLR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TGLR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TGLR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $39M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.76% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 32 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +10.88% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +22.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +20.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Wedbush Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 13, 2026 |
IVV vs TGLR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is a ETF from Wedbush Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while TGLR returned +22.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 10.88% for TGLR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +20.63% for TGLR. Across the full 3-year window we track, TGLR has the edge at +20.63% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for TGLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.8% for TGLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TGLR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.76% for TGLR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TGLR share 29 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TGLR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TGLR charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TGLR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +22.36% for TGLR, so TGLR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +20.63% for TGLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TGLR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for TGLR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TGLR -19.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TGLR?
IVV and TGLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TGLR?
IVV and TGLR share 29 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TGLR?
IVV yields 1.10% while TGLR yields 0.76%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.