TGLR vs VYM
Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TGLR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $39M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.49% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.31% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Wedbush Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 13, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
TGLR vs VYM Performance
Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is a ETF from Wedbush Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TGLR returned +20.49% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, TGLR is up 9.94% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, TGLR compounded at +20.31% per year against +18.72% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, TGLR has the edge at +20.31% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.8% for TGLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for TGLR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TGLR charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TGLR currently yields 0.76% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
TGLR and VYM share 16 holdings out of 620 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TGLR or VYM?
TGLR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TGLR or VYM?
Over the past year TGLR returned +20.49% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TGLR annualized +20.31% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TGLR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.8% for TGLR. Worst drawdown: TGLR -19.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both TGLR and VYM?
TGLR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TGLR and VYM?
TGLR and VYM share 16 common holdings with a 23.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 620 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TGLR or VYM?
TGLR yields 0.76% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.