IVV vs TNXT

IVV vs TNXT

Which is better, IVV or TNXT?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. TNXT is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: TNXT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTNXT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.49%
AUM$876.4B$18M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings508303
YTD Return+11.03%+12.47%Best
1Y Return+15.62%-
3Y Return (annualized)+20.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.61%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%33.6%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)T.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 28, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs TNXT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs TNXT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF (TNXT) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 12.47% for TNXT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TNXT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TNXT.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in TNXT54.5%
TNXT already in IVV64.5%

54.5% of IVV's money is in holdings TNXT also owns. 64.5% of TNXT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

82 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 270 in TNXT, against full books of 508 and 303.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 121 positions for TNXT that do not appear in our book for IVV (20.7% of the fund), and 400 for IVV that do not appear in TNXT (44.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TNXTDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%7.98%0.09%
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%5.27%1.75%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%3.72%1.97%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%3.94%0.10%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%2.90%0.25%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%2.30%0.70%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.39%2.10%0.29%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.61%0.29%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.16%2.10%0.94%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%1.62%0.01%

64.5% of TNXT is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVTNXT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TNXT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TNXT charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TNXT?

64.5% of TNXT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 64.5% of TNXT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 82 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 270 in TNXT.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TNXT?

IVV yields 1.06% while TNXT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TNXT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. TNXT is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.