TRUN vs VYM
VanEck Energy TruSector ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, TRUN or VYM?
VYM costs less.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TRUN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.16% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $276,689.12 | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 23 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +13.11%Best | +9.59% |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.66% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Top 10 Weight | 84.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TRUN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TRUN vs VYM Performance
VanEck Energy TruSector ETF (TRUN) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TRUN is up 13.11% versus a gain of 9.59% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TRUN charges 0.16% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $16 vs $4 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TRUN currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
76.0% of TRUN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 8.7% of VYM's money is in holdings TRUN also owns.
Most of TRUN is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in TRUN and 557 in VYM, against full books of 23 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 22 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 508 positions TRUN does not, 88.4% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.35%, JPM 3.82%, JNJ 2.51%, CSCO 1.86%, ABBV 1.80%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TRUN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 24.47% | 2.63% | 21.84% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 13.37% | 1.48% | 11.89% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 5.63% | 0.60% | 5.03% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 3.52% | 0.38% | 3.14% |
| VLOValero Energy | 3.45% | 0.38% | 3.07% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.06% | 0.35% | 2.71% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 3.06% | 0.34% | 2.72% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 2.58% | 0.30% | 2.28% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 2.39% | 0.32% | 2.07% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 1.86% | 0.24% | 1.62% |
76.0% of TRUN is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TRUN or VYM?
TRUN has an expense ratio of 0.16% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TRUN and VYM?
76.0% of TRUN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 8.7% of VYM's is in holdings TRUN also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in TRUN and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, TRUN or VYM?
TRUN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than TRUN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.