IVV vs USMF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
Which is better, IVV or USMF?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. USMF is less concentrated, with 17.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | USMF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.28% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $279M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.33% |
| Holdings | 508 | 202 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +2.85% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +0.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +11.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51%Best | +7.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -36.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,844Best | $14,263 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 17.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 29, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2017 to Sep 18, 2026 (9.2 years).
IVV vs USMF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs USMF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while USMF returned +0.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 2.85% for USMF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +11.43% for USMF; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and +7.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.22% annualized vs +9.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 14.9% for USMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -36.2% for USMF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while USMF charges 0.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $28 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.33% for USMF.
Holdings Overlap
37.9% of IVV's money is in holdings USMF also owns. 65.2% of USMF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
119 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 197 in USMF, against full books of 508 and 202.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for USMF that do not appear in our book for IVV (27.6% of the fund), and 363 for IVV that do not appear in USMF (60.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in USMF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 4.09% | 3.98% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 4.21% | 2.81% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 1.52% | 1.13% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 1.32% | 0.06% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.05% | 0.58% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 1.04% | 0.07% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.55% | 0.94% | 0.39% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 0.05% | 1.33% | 1.28% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.68% | 0.70% | 0.02% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.66% | 0.65% | 0.01% |
65.2% of USMF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or USMF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while USMF charges 0.28%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or USMF?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +0.92% for USMF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +14.22% vs +9.94% for USMF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or USMF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 14.9% for USMF. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs USMF -36.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and USMF?
IVV and USMF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and USMF?
65.2% of USMF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 65.2% of USMF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 119 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 197 in USMF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or USMF?
IVV yields 1.06% while USMF yields 1.33%, so USMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USMF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. USMF is less concentrated, with 17.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.