IVV vs VUG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or VUG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV led over 1Y and 5Y, VUG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Tie | 0.03%Tie |
| AUM | $876.4B | $219.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.38% |
| Holdings | 508 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +7.68% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +10.35% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | +23.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +11.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -51.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $17,529 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 63.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 26, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2004 to Sep 16, 2026 (22.6 years).
IVV vs VUG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs VUG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (VUG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while VUG returned +10.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 7.68% for VUG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +23.24% for VUG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +11.88% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VUG has the edge at +11.12% annualized vs +9.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -51.4% for VUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VUG charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.38% for VUG.
Holdings Overlap
57.8% of IVV's money is in holdings VUG also owns. 97.3% of VUG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of VUG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
122 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 147 in VUG, against full books of 508 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for VUG that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.4% of the fund), and 360 for IVV that do not appear in VUG (40.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VUG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 12.81% | 4.74% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 12.59% | 5.57% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 9.59% | 3.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 5.15% | 1.31% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 5.80% | 2.80% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.46% | 1.81% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 4.62% | 2.23% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 3.41% | 1.51% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 2.72% | 1.34% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 2.44% | 0.88% |
97.3% of VUG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VUG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VUG charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, IVV or VUG?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +10.35% for VUG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IVV annualized +9.12% vs +11.12% for VUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VUG?
VUG has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VUG -51.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and VUG?
IVV and VUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VUG?
97.3% of VUG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 97.3% of VUG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 122 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 147 in VUG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VUG?
IVV yields 1.06% while VUG yields 0.38%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VUG better than IVV?
IVV led over 1Y and 5Y, VUG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.