IVV vs XBFR

IVV vs XBFR

Which is better, IVV or XBFR?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVXBFR
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$47M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.10%
Holdings508400
YTD Return+12.39%Best+6.59%
1Y Return+16.61%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best38.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2000Feb 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs XBFR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs XBFR Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 6.59% for XBFR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while XBFR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.10% for XBFR.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in XBFR67.7%
XBFR already in IVV89.1%

67.7% of IVV's money is in holdings XBFR also owns. 89.1% of XBFR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of XBFR is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

114 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 182 in XBFR, against full books of 508 and 400.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 60 positions for XBFR that do not appear in our book for IVV (7.4% of the fund), and 368 for IVV that do not appear in XBFR (31.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in XBFRDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%7.88%0.19%
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%7.15%0.13%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%5.68%0.01%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%3.81%0.03%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%3.03%0.03%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%2.46%0.19%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.39%2.57%0.18%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.90%0.00%
TSLATesla Inc1.56%1.88%0.32%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%1.71%0.08%

89.1% of XBFR is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVXBFR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or XBFR?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XBFR charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XBFR?

89.1% of XBFR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 89.1% of XBFR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 114 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 182 in XBFR.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XBFR?

IVV yields 1.06% while XBFR yields 0.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XBFR better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.