IVV vs XVOL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XVOL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.83% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 83 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +1.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +20.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +9.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +4.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Acruence Capital, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 21, 2021 |
IVV vs XVOL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF (XVOL) is a ETF from Acruence Capital, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while XVOL returned +20.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 1.47% for XVOL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +9.96% for XVOL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +4.79% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XVOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.8% for XVOL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XVOL charges 0.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $83 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.00% for XVOL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XVOL share 77 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XVOL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XVOL charges 0.83%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XVOL?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +20.04% for XVOL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +4.79% for XVOL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XVOL?
XVOL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XVOL -25.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and XVOL?
IVV and XVOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XVOL?
IVV and XVOL share 77 common holdings with a 23.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XVOL?
IVV yields 1.10% while XVOL yields 2.00%, so XVOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.