IWV vs VTI
iShares Russell 3000 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IWV or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 2,596 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.93% | +11.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.11% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.25% | +20.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.43% | +11.59%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Tie | 15.3%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,180 | $17,303Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 15, 2026 (25.3 years).
IWV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
IWV vs VTI Performance
iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWV returned +15.11% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, IWV is up 10.93% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, IWV compounded at +20.25% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.43% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.00% annualized vs +7.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWV and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.3% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for IWV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWV charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWV currently yields 0.85% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.9% of IWV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 97.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IWV also owns.
Most of VTI is already inside IWV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
2,398 positions in common, counted across the 2,564 positions we hold weights for in IWV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 2,596 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IWV (0.7% of the fund), and 21 for IWV that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.90% | 6.40% | 0.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.40% | 6.29% | 0.11% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.07% | 4.79% | 0.28% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.37% | 3.65% | 0.28% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.66% | 2.90% | 0.24% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.34% | 2.56% | 0.22% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.16% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.73% | 1.70% | 0.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.43% | 1.29% | 0.14% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.42% | 1.22% | 0.20% |
97.2% of VTI is already inside IWV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWV or VTI?
IWV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWV or VTI?
Over the past year IWV returned +15.11% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IWV annualized +7.76% vs +8.00% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWV or VTI?
IWV and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.3% annualized. Worst drawdown: IWV -56.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IWV and VTI?
IWV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IWV and VTI?
97.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IWV also owns. 97.2% of VTI's is in holdings IWV also owns. They hold 2,398 positions in common, counted across the 2,564 positions we hold weights for in IWV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWV or VTI?
IWV yields 0.85% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IWV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.