JGRO vs QQQ
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. JGRO offers more diversification with 129 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGRO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $10.2B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 129 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.62% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.56% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.94% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 8, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JGRO vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JGRO returned +7.56% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, JGRO is up 1.62% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, JGRO compounded at +19.94% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, JGRO has the edge at +17.50% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.2% for JGRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for JGRO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGRO charges 0.44% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $18 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGRO currently yields 0.16% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JGRO and QQQ share 39 holdings out of 194 unique holdings combined, representing a 44.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGRO or QQQ?
JGRO has an expense ratio of 0.44% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JGRO or QQQ?
Over the past year JGRO returned +7.56% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), JGRO annualized +17.50% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JGRO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.2% for JGRO. Worst drawdown: JGRO -22.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JGRO and QQQ?
JGRO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between JGRO and QQQ?
JGRO and QQQ share 39 common holdings with a 44.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 194 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGRO or QQQ?
JGRO yields 0.16% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.