JHAC vs VTI
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHAC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.35% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.43% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.17% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
JHAC vs VTI Performance
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JHAC returned +8.17% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, JHAC is up 4.43% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.8% for JHAC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for JHAC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHAC charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHAC currently yields 2.35% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JHAC and VTI share 42 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHAC or VTI?
JHAC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JHAC or VTI?
Over the past year JHAC returned +8.17% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), JHAC annualized +17.42% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JHAC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.8% for JHAC. Worst drawdown: JHAC -24.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JHAC and VTI?
JHAC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between JHAC and VTI?
JHAC and VTI share 42 common holdings with a 21.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHAC or VTI?
JHAC yields 2.35% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JHAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.