JHAC vs VOO
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHAC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.35% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.43% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.17% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JHAC vs VOO Performance
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JHAC returned +8.17% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, JHAC is up 4.43% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JHAC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for JHAC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHAC charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHAC currently yields 2.35% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JHAC and VOO share 31 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHAC or VOO?
JHAC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JHAC or VOO?
Over the past year JHAC returned +8.17% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), JHAC annualized +17.42% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JHAC or VOO?
JHAC has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JHAC -24.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JHAC and VOO?
JHAC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between JHAC and VOO?
JHAC and VOO share 31 common holdings with a 23.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHAC or VOO?
JHAC yields 2.35% while VOO yields 1.08%, so JHAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.