JHAC vs VOO
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, JHAC or VOO?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHAC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.25% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.42% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.53% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $15,626 | $18,556Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.9% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.9 years).
JHAC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
JHAC vs VOO Performance
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JHAC returned +2.53% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, JHAC is up 3.42% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JHAC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 11.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for JHAC and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHAC charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHAC currently yields 2.25% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
70.5% of JHAC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.0% of VOO's money is in holdings JHAC also owns.
Most of JHAC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
29 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in JHAC and 505 in VOO, against full books of 52 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 467 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for JHAC (66.4% of the fund), and 17 for JHAC that do not appear in VOO (22.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JHAC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.57% | 3.62% | 4.95% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 7.72% | 4.30% | 3.42% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.88% | 7.51% | 3.63% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 6.37% | 3.25% | 3.12% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.44% | 6.59% | 5.15% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.15% | 2.77% | 0.38% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.95% | 1.92% | 1.03% |
| KKRKkr & Co. Inc. Class a | 3.57% | 0.10% | 3.47% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 3.01% | 0.05% | 2.96% |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 2.42% | 0.29% | 2.13% |
70.5% of JHAC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHAC or VOO?
JHAC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JHAC or VOO?
Over the past year JHAC returned +2.53% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JHAC or VOO?
JHAC has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 11.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JHAC -24.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both JHAC and VOO?
JHAC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JHAC and VOO?
70.5% of JHAC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.0% of VOO's is in holdings JHAC also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in JHAC and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHAC or VOO?
JHAC yields 2.25% while VOO yields 1.04%, so JHAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than JHAC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.