JHDG vs VTI

JHDG vs VTI

Which is better, JHDG or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJHDGVTI
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$107M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.10%1.03%
Holdings1173,543
YTD Return+8.84%+12.28%Best
1Y Return-+16.78%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.89%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.94%
Top 10 Weight47.9%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyJohn Hancock Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 8, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JHDG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

JHDG vs VTI Performance

John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JHDG is up 8.84% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JHDG charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHDG currently yields 0.10% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

JHDG already in VTI89.5%
VTI already in JHDG34.2%

89.5% of JHDG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 34.2% of VTI's money is in holdings JHDG also owns.

Most of JHDG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

43 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in JHDG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 117 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,107 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for JHDG (63.2% of the fund), and 2 for JHDG that do not appear in VTI (2.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JHDGWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp8.63%4.79%3.84%
NVDANvidia Corp5.19%6.40%1.21%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A7.13%2.90%4.23%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.38%3.65%2.73%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.98%2.56%1.42%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.44%1.31%3.13%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.91%1.35%1.56%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity2.91%1.28%1.63%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.3.48%0.59%2.89%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.80%1.08%1.72%

89.5% of JHDG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JHDGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JHDG or VTI?

JHDG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JHDG and VTI?

89.5% of JHDG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 34.2% of VTI's is in holdings JHDG also owns. They hold 43 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in JHDG and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, JHDG or VTI?

JHDG yields 0.10% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than JHDG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.