JLCO vs SPY

JLCO vs SPY

Which is better, JLCO or SPY?

SPY costs less.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJLCOSPY
Expense Ratio0.39%0.09%Best
AUM$11M$804.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings53505
YTD Return+1.19%+12.47%Best
1Y Return-+17.51%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.88%
Top 10 Weight46.7%38.0%Best
Fund FamilyJohn Hancock Investment ManagementState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 14, 2026Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JLCO vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

JLCO vs SPY Performance

John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, JLCO is up 1.19% versus a gain of 12.47% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JLCO charges 0.39% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $9 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JLCO currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

JLCO already in SPY78.3%
SPY already in JLCO36.2%

78.3% of JLCO's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 36.2% of SPY's money is in holdings JLCO also owns.

Most of JLCO is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

33 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 504 in SPY, against full books of 53 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 461 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for JLCO (63.3% of the fund), and 12 for JLCO that do not appear in SPY (12.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JLCOWeight in SPYDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 378.03%5.50%2.53%
NVDANvidia Corp.5.04%7.71%2.67%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0016.90%3.33%3.57%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.12%4.08%2.04%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.59%2.97%1.62%
JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co.4.22%1.44%2.78%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.98%1.33%1.65%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.3.03%1.27%1.76%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B2.50%1.42%1.08%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.3.19%0.63%2.56%

78.3% of JLCO is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JLCOSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JLCO or SPY?

JLCO has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JLCO and SPY?

78.3% of JLCO's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 36.2% of SPY's is in holdings JLCO also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, JLCO or SPY?

JLCO yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than JLCO?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.