JLCO vs VTI
John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, JLCO or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JLCO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +1.19% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
JLCO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JLCO vs VTI Performance
John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JLCO is up 1.19% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JLCO charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JLCO currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 86.3% of JLCO's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of JLCO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, JLCO as of Aug 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
40 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JLCO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 8.03% | 3.81% | 4.22% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.04% | 6.32% | 1.28% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 6.90% | 2.88% | 4.02% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.12% | 3.17% | 2.95% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.59% | 2.46% | 2.13% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 4.22% | 1.11% | 3.11% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.98% | 1.40% | 1.58% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 3.03% | 1.30% | 1.73% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 3.19% | 0.57% | 2.62% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 2.50% | 1.24% | 1.26% |
86.3% of JLCO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JLCO or VTI?
JLCO has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JLCO and VTI?
At least 86.3% of JLCO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, JLCO or VTI?
JLCO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than JLCO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.