KNGZ vs QQQ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, KNGZ or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KNGZ is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KNGZ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $65M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 198 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +15.95% | +24.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.66% | +25.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.91% | +28.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.88% | +16.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0%Best | 19.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.5% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,017 | $21,515Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.8%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 22, 2017 to Oct 7, 2026 (9.3 years).
KNGZ vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.3 years both funds cover.
KNGZ vs QQQ Performance
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KNGZ returned +17.66% while QQQ returned +25.94%. Year to date, KNGZ is up 15.95% versus a gain of 24.01% for QQQ.
Over three years, KNGZ compounded at +17.91% per year against +28.16% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.88% and +16.56% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.30% annualized vs +9.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 17.0% for KNGZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.5% for KNGZ and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KNGZ charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KNGZ currently yields 2.43% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
23.3% of KNGZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings KNGZ also owns.
KNGZ and QQQ share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in KNGZ and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 198 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for KNGZ (83.7% of the fund), and 82 for KNGZ that do not appear in QQQ (71.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KNGZ | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.97% | 5.88% | 3.91% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.78% | 0.85% | 2.93% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.12% | 1.08% | 2.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.95% | 2.74% | 1.79% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc. | 3.17% | 0.18% | 2.99% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 2.93% | 0.40% | 2.53% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.70% | 0.82% | 0.88% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 2.02% | 0.17% | 1.85% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 0.73% | 0.50% | 0.23% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.96% | 0.18% | 0.78% |
23.3% of KNGZ is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KNGZ or QQQ?
KNGZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KNGZ or QQQ?
Over the past year KNGZ returned +17.66% vs +25.94% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KNGZ annualized +9.80% vs +20.30% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KNGZ or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 17.0% for KNGZ. Worst drawdown: KNGZ -37.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both KNGZ and QQQ?
KNGZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KNGZ and QQQ?
23.3% of KNGZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.0% of QQQ's is in holdings KNGZ also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in KNGZ and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, KNGZ or QQQ?
KNGZ yields 2.43% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so KNGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than KNGZ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KNGZ is less concentrated, with 36.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.