KNGZ vs VOO
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KNGZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KNGZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.83% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.76% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.80% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.25% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KNGZ vs VOO Performance
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KNGZ returned +25.76% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, KNGZ is up 19.83% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, KNGZ compounded at +17.80% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.25% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KNGZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.5% for KNGZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KNGZ charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KNGZ currently yields 2.52% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KNGZ and VOO share 95 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KNGZ or VOO?
KNGZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KNGZ or VOO?
Over the past year KNGZ returned +25.76% vs +21.87% for VOO, so KNGZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KNGZ annualized +10.34% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KNGZ or VOO?
KNGZ has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KNGZ -37.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KNGZ and VOO?
KNGZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between KNGZ and VOO?
KNGZ and VOO share 95 common holdings with a 15.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KNGZ or VOO?
KNGZ yields 2.52% while VOO yields 1.08%, so KNGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.