LCOW vs VYM
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, LCOW or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LCOW led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCOW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $27M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 202 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +13.00%Best | +10.00% |
| 1Y Return | +14.87%Best | +13.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,508Best | $12,950 |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.4 years).
LCOW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
LCOW vs VYM Performance
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCOW returned +14.87% while VYM returned +13.75%. Year to date, LCOW is up 13.00% versus a gain of 10.00% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LCOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.6% compared with 9.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LCOW and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCOW charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCOW currently yields 0.60% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
36.1% of LCOW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.3% of VYM's money is in holdings LCOW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, LCOW as of Sep 15, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
39 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in LCOW and 557 in VYM, against full books of 202 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 489 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for LCOW (71.7% of the fund), and 61 for LCOW that do not appear in VYM (63.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LCOW | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.31% | 7.35% | 3.04% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.85% | 1.80% | 3.05% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.47% | 2.51% | 0.96% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.97% | 1.21% | 1.76% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.06% | 1.86% | 0.20% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.70% | 1.31% | 0.39% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.32% | 0.78% | 0.54% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.41% | 0.66% | 0.75% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 1.53% | 0.46% | 1.07% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 1.06% | 0.78% | 0.28% |
36.1% of LCOW is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCOW or VYM?
LCOW has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LCOW or VYM?
Over the past year LCOW returned +14.87% vs +13.75% for VYM, so LCOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LCOW annualized +23.96% vs +20.28% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LCOW or VYM?
LCOW has been the more volatile fund at 10.6% annualized versus 9.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LCOW -10.6% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both LCOW and VYM?
LCOW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LCOW and VYM?
36.1% of LCOW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.3% of VYM's is in holdings LCOW also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in LCOW and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCOW or VYM?
LCOW yields 0.60% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than LCOW?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LCOW led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.