LCOW vs VOO
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCOW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $27M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.36% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.64% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LCOW vs VOO Performance
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCOW returned +18.64% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, LCOW is up 11.36% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.1% for LCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LCOW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCOW charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCOW currently yields 0.62% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LCOW and VOO share 100 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCOW or VOO?
LCOW has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCOW or VOO?
Over the past year LCOW returned +18.64% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LCOW annualized +24.94% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCOW or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.1% for LCOW. Worst drawdown: LCOW -10.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LCOW and VOO?
LCOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LCOW and VOO?
LCOW and VOO share 100 common holdings with a 37.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCOW or VOO?
LCOW yields 0.62% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.