LCOW vs VTI
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCOW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $27M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.68% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.89% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LCOW vs VTI Performance
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCOW returned +17.89% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, LCOW is up 11.68% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.1% for LCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LCOW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCOW charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCOW currently yields 0.62% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LCOW and VTI share 94 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCOW or VTI?
LCOW has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCOW or VTI?
Over the past year LCOW returned +17.89% vs +20.47% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LCOW annualized +25.04% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCOW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.1% for LCOW. Worst drawdown: LCOW -10.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LCOW and VTI?
LCOW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LCOW and VTI?
LCOW and VTI share 94 common holdings with a 33.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCOW or VTI?
LCOW yields 0.62% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.