LSGR vs QQQ
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $921M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 23 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.07% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.93% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.03% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
LSGR vs QQQ Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is a ETF from Natixis Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +5.93% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, LSGR is up 1.07% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +21.03% per year against +26.08% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, LSGR has the edge at +20.59% annualized vs +13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.1% for LSGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
LSGR and QQQ share 14 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or QQQ?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSGR or QQQ?
Over the past year LSGR returned +5.93% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LSGR annualized +20.59% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.1% for LSGR. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both LSGR and QQQ?
LSGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and QQQ?
LSGR and QQQ share 14 common holdings with a 31.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or QQQ?
LSGR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.