LSGR vs QQQ
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LSGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $908M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 23 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +2.25% | +21.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.95% | +24.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57% | +27.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,090 | $20,559Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 74.5% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.2 years).
LSGR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
LSGR vs QQQ Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is an ETF from Natixis Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +1.95% while QQQ returned +24.36%. Year to date, LSGR is up 2.25% versus a gain of 21.18% for QQQ.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +22.57% per year against +27.99% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 17.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
81.4% of LSGR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 31.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings LSGR also owns.
Most of LSGR is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
14 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 23 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 21 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 82 positions LSGR does not, 65.8% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 7.27%, MU 4.43%, AMD 3.45%, AVGO 3.16%, GOOG 3.13%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSGR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 18.24% | 8.44% | 9.80% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.30% | 3.36% | 7.94% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.72% | 4.67% | 3.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.82% | 5.76% | 0.06% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 7.32% | 2.78% | 4.54% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 6.12% | 2.56% | 3.56% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.98% | 0.54% | 4.44% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.98% | 1.37% | 2.61% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 4.85% | 0.41% | 4.44% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 3.55% | 0.22% | 3.33% |
81.4% of LSGR is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or QQQ?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSGR or QQQ?
Over the past year LSGR returned +1.95% vs +24.36% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSGR or QQQ?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 17.2% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both LSGR and QQQ?
LSGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and QQQ?
81.4% of LSGR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 31.7% of QQQ's is in holdings LSGR also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or QQQ?
LSGR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LSGR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.