LSGR vs VTI
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LSGR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LSGR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $908M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 23 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.25% | +13.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.95% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57%Best | +22.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,090Best | $17,927 |
| Top 10 Weight | 74.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.2 years).
LSGR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
LSGR vs VTI Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is an ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +1.95% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, LSGR is up 2.25% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +22.57% per year against +22.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.6% of LSGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 23.8% of VTI's money is in holdings LSGR also owns.
Most of LSGR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
21 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 23 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 21 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,129 positions LSGR does not, 73.7% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 6.29%, AVGO 2.56%, GOOG 2.31%, LLY 1.35%, JPM 1.31%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSGR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 18.24% | 6.40% | 11.84% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.30% | 2.90% | 8.40% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.72% | 3.65% | 4.07% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.82% | 4.79% | 1.03% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 7.32% | 1.70% | 5.62% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 6.12% | 1.22% | 4.90% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.98% | 0.17% | 4.81% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.16% | 0.83% | 3.33% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 4.85% | 0.09% | 4.76% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.98% | 0.42% | 3.56% |
99.6% of LSGR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or VTI?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSGR or VTI?
Over the past year LSGR returned +1.95% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSGR or VTI?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LSGR and VTI?
LSGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and VTI?
99.6% of LSGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 23.8% of VTI's is in holdings LSGR also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or VTI?
LSGR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LSGR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LSGR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.