LSGR vs VTI
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LSGR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LSGR led over the full window, VTI over 1Y and 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $923M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 23 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.84% | +13.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.29% | +21.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.78% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,560Best | $18,239 |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2023 to Sep 3, 2026 (3.2 years).
LSGR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
LSGR vs VTI Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is an ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +8.29% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, LSGR is up 3.84% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +20.78% per year against +21.10% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.3% of LSGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of LSGR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, LSGR as of Aug 19, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 23 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSGR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 18.28% | 6.32% | 11.96% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 11.81% | 2.88% | 8.93% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.04% | 3.17% | 4.87% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.78% | 3.81% | 1.97% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 6.87% | 1.70% | 5.17% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 5.91% | 1.63% | 4.28% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 5.29% | 0.09% | 5.20% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.83% | 0.17% | 4.66% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.09% | 0.77% | 3.32% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.82% | 0.41% | 3.41% |
98.3% of LSGR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or VTI?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSGR or VTI?
Over the past year LSGR returned +8.29% vs +21.44% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSGR or VTI?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LSGR and VTI?
LSGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and VTI?
At least 98.3% of LSGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or VTI?
LSGR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LSGR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LSGR led over the full window, VTI over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.