LSGR vs VOO
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $921M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 23 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.58% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.78% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.94% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LSGR vs VOO Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is a ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +4.78% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, LSGR is up 1.58% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +20.94% per year against +22.19% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, LSGR has the edge at +20.88% annualized vs +13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LSGR and VOO share 20 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or VOO?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSGR or VOO?
Over the past year LSGR returned +4.78% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LSGR annualized +20.88% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSGR or VOO?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LSGR and VOO?
LSGR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and VOO?
LSGR and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 25.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or VOO?
LSGR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.