LSGR vs VOO
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LSGR or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LSGR led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $923M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 23 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.84% | +13.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.29% | +21.53%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.78% | +21.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,560Best | $18,428 |
| Top 10 Weight | 74.8% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2023 to Sep 3, 2026 (3.2 years).
LSGR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
LSGR vs VOO Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is an ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSGR returned +8.29% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, LSGR is up 3.84% versus a gain of 13.81% for VOO.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +20.78% per year against +21.46% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 12.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.0% of LSGR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 25.8% of VOO's money is in holdings LSGR also owns.
Most of LSGR is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, LSGR as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 505 in VOO, against full books of 23 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LSGR (73.7% of the fund), and 1 for LSGR that do not appear in VOO (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSGR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 18.28% | 7.51% | 10.77% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 11.81% | 3.25% | 8.56% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.04% | 3.62% | 4.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.78% | 4.30% | 1.48% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 6.87% | 1.92% | 4.95% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 5.91% | 1.84% | 4.07% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 5.29% | 0.11% | 5.18% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.83% | 0.20% | 4.63% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.09% | 0.87% | 3.22% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.82% | 0.47% | 3.35% |
99.0% of LSGR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or VOO?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSGR or VOO?
Over the past year LSGR returned +8.29% vs +21.53% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSGR or VOO?
LSGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 12.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LSGR and VOO?
LSGR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and VOO?
99.0% of LSGR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 25.8% of VOO's is in holdings LSGR also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or VOO?
LSGR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LSGR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LSGR led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.