MAVF vs VXUS
MAVF vs VXUS
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MAVF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $91M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +16.33% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.64% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MAVF vs VXUS Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is a ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +29.64% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MAVF is up 16.33% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for MAVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.38% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MAVF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7868 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or VXUS?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAVF or VXUS?
Over the past year MAVF returned +29.64% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MAVF annualized +26.01% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAVF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for MAVF. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MAVF and VXUS?
MAVF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and VXUS?
MAVF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7868 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or VXUS?
MAVF yields 0.38% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.