MAVF vs VOO
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MAVF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $93M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.44% | +12.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.94% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MAVF vs VOO Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is a ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +21.94% while VOO returned +20.36%. Year to date, MAVF is up 12.44% versus a gain of 12.13% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MAVF and VOO share 26 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or VOO?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAVF or VOO?
Over the past year MAVF returned +21.94% vs +20.36% for VOO, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +21.94% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAVF or VOO?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MAVF and VOO?
MAVF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and VOO?
MAVF and VOO share 26 common holdings with a 25.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or VOO?
MAVF yields 0.37% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.