MAVF vs QQQ
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MAVF or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $92M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 29 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.75% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.90% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4%Best | -19.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,643 | $14,092Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.5% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs QQQ Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +17.90% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, MAVF is up 12.75% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 14.7% for MAVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -19.9% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
54.5% of MAVF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 29.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 29 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 28 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 84 positions MAVF does not, 67.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, MU 4.43%, AMD 3.45%, GOOGL 3.36%, AVGO 3.16%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAVF | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.87% | 7.27% | 0.40% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.25% | 5.76% | 2.49% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.49% | 4.67% | 1.82% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 7.70% | 3.13% | 4.57% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.64% | 2.78% | 1.86% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.76% | 0.83% | 2.93% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.68% | 1.86% | 0.82% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.67% | 0.73% | 2.94% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.74% | 0.97% | 1.77% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 3.26% | 0.39% | 2.87% |
54.5% of MAVF is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or QQQ?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or QQQ?
Over the past year MAVF returned +17.90% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +21.43% vs +23.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 14.7% for MAVF. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs QQQ -19.9%.
Should I hold both MAVF and QQQ?
MAVF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and QQQ?
54.5% of MAVF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 29.7% of QQQ's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or QQQ?
MAVF yields 0.37% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MAVF?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.