IVV vs MAVF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MAVF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MAVF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $91M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 29 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +15.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +28.25% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Matrix Asset Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 16, 1983 |
IVV vs MAVF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is a ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while MAVF returned +28.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 15.95% for MAVF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for MAVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.38% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MAVF share 7 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MAVF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MAVF charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MAVF?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +28.25% for MAVF, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +25.51% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MAVF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for MAVF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and MAVF?
IVV and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MAVF?
IVV and MAVF share 7 common holdings with a 16.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MAVF?
IVV yields 1.09% while MAVF yields 0.38%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.