MAVF vs VYM
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $92M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 29 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.32%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +18.89%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -13.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,807Best | $12,436 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.5% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Sep 22, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs VYM Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +18.89% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, MAVF is up 14.32% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -13.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
52.4% of MAVF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.2% of VYM's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 557 in VYM, against full books of 29 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 28 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 511 positions MAVF does not, 83.9% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.35%, XOM 2.63%, JNJ 2.51%, CSCO 1.86%, ABBV 1.80%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAVF | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.38% | 3.82% | 0.44% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 3.68% | 1.07% | 2.61% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.76% | 0.77% | 2.99% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.67% | 0.63% | 3.04% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 3.73% | 0.44% | 3.29% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 3.05% | 0.96% | 2.09% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 3.29% | 0.47% | 2.82% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 3.50% | 0.24% | 3.26% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 3.32% | 0.41% | 2.91% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 3.26% | 0.34% | 2.92% |
52.4% of MAVF is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or VYM?
Over the past year MAVF returned +18.89% vs +15.42% for VYM, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +22.34% vs +14.60% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs VYM -13.8%.
Should I hold both MAVF and VYM?
MAVF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and VYM?
52.4% of MAVF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 13.2% of VYM's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF yields 0.37% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MAVF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.