MAVF vs VYM
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MAVF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $93M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +12.44% | +14.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.94% | +20.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MAVF vs VYM Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is a ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAVF returned +21.94% while VYM returned +20.67%. Year to date, MAVF is up 12.44% versus a gain of 14.18% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MAVF and VYM share 17 holdings out of 614 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAVF or VYM?
Over the past year MAVF returned +21.94% vs +20.67% for VYM, so MAVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +21.94% vs +6.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MAVF and VYM?
MAVF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and VYM?
MAVF and VYM share 17 common holdings with a 13.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 614 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or VYM?
MAVF yields 0.37% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.