MNZL vs QQQ

MNZL vs QQQ

Which is better, MNZL or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MNZL is less concentrated, with 40.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: MNZL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMNZLQQQ
Expense Ratio0.40%0.18%Best
AUM$29M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.03%0.44%
Holdings490107
YTD Return+14.87%+15.94%Best
1Y Return-+20.44%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.26%
Top 10 Weight40.7%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyManzil Investment Advisors, LLCInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 18, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

MNZL vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

MNZL vs QQQ Performance

Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) is an ETF from Manzil Investment Advisors, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MNZL is up 14.87% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MNZL charges 0.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $18 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNZL currently yields 0.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

MNZL already in QQQ50.8%
QQQ already in MNZL47.8%

50.8% of MNZL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 47.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings MNZL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

57 positions in common, counted across the 485 positions we hold weights for in MNZL and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 490 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 39 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MNZL (49.8% of the fund), and 401 for MNZL that do not appear in QQQ (47.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MNZLWeight in QQQDifference
AAPLApple, Inc15.79%7.27%8.52%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.65%3.16%2.49%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.89%4.43%0.54%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.63%3.45%0.82%
TSLATesla Inc3.50%2.56%0.94%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.21%1.86%0.65%
LRCXLam Research Corp 3.125 06/15/20601.29%1.69%0.40%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc0.91%1.30%0.39%
KLACKla Corp0.81%1.11%0.30%
TXNTexas Instrument Inc0.79%1.12%0.33%

50.8% of MNZL is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

MNZLQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MNZL or QQQ?

MNZL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between MNZL and QQQ?

50.8% of MNZL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 47.8% of QQQ's is in holdings MNZL also owns. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 485 positions we hold weights for in MNZL and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, MNZL or QQQ?

MNZL yields 0.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than MNZL?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MNZL is less concentrated, with 40.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.