MNZL vs VYM
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MNZL or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MNZL led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNZL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 975 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +16.32%Best | +14.91% |
| 1Y Return | +20.24%Best | +18.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.11% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 11.9%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Manzil Investment Advisors, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MNZL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MNZL vs VYM Performance
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) is an ETF from Manzil Investment Advisors, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MNZL returned +20.24% while VYM returned +18.73%. Year to date, MNZL is up 16.32% versus a gain of 14.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNZL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 11.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNZL charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNZL currently yields 0.03% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
31.6% of MNZL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 38.4% of VYM's money is in holdings MNZL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
145 positions in common, counted across the 484 positions we hold weights for in MNZL and 602 in VYM, against full books of 975 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 434 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MNZL (60.2% of the fund), and 317 for MNZL that do not appear in VYM (67.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MNZL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.40% | 6.94% | 1.54% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.06% | 2.58% | 0.52% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.69% | 1.83% | 0.14% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.21% | 1.47% | 0.26% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.23% | 1.36% | 0.13% |
| HDHome Depot Inc | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.28% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.11% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.77% | 0.91% | 0.14% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.08% |
| ABTAbbot Laboratories | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.16% |
38.4% of VYM is already inside MNZL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNZL or VYM?
MNZL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MNZL or VYM?
Over the past year MNZL returned +20.24% vs +18.73% for VYM, so MNZL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MNZL or VYM?
MNZL has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 11.9% for VYM.
Should I hold both MNZL and VYM?
MNZL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MNZL and VYM?
38.4% of VYM's money is in holdings MNZL also owns. 38.4% of VYM's is in holdings MNZL also owns. They hold 145 positions in common, counted across the 484 positions we hold weights for in MNZL and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNZL or VYM?
MNZL yields 0.03% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MNZL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MNZL led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.