NUDV vs VTI
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NUDV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NUDV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NUDV is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 166 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +13.28%Best | +8.54% |
| 1Y Return | +18.35%Best | +11.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.26% | +20.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.62% | +9.84%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,120 | $15,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.6%Best | 34.6% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2021 to Nov 6, 2026 (5.1 years).
NUDV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
NUDV vs VTI Performance
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUDV returned +18.35% while VTI returned +11.14%. Year to date, NUDV is up 13.28% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Over three years, NUDV compounded at +17.26% per year against +20.29% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.62% and +9.84% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for NUDV and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDV charges 0.26% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDV currently yields 2.07% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.1% of NUDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 11.0% of VTI's money is in holdings NUDV also owns.
Most of NUDV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
81 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in NUDV and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 166 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,048 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NUDV (85.9% of the fund), and 1 for NUDV that do not appear in VTI (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUDV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.84% | 0.45% | 2.39% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.72% | 0.49% | 2.23% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.47% | 0.63% | 1.84% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 2.56% | 0.46% | 2.10% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.43% | 0.52% | 1.91% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 2.22% | 0.33% | 1.89% |
| IBMIbm | 2.16% | 0.28% | 1.88% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 2.10% | 0.23% | 1.87% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.02% | 0.30% | 1.72% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 2.05% | 0.22% | 1.83% |
98.1% of NUDV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDV or VTI?
NUDV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUDV or VTI?
Over the past year NUDV returned +18.35% vs +11.14% for VTI, so NUDV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUDV or VTI?
NUDV has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NUDV -20.1% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both NUDV and VTI?
NUDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDV and VTI?
98.1% of NUDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 11.0% of VTI's is in holdings NUDV also owns. They hold 81 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in NUDV and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDV or VTI?
NUDV yields 2.07% while VTI yields 1.06%, so NUDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NUDV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NUDV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NUDV is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.