NUDV vs VYM
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NUDV or VYM?
Nearly the same fund. VYM costs less.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. NUDV is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 86 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +11.34% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.45% | +17.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.79% | +17.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.43% | +12.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,692 | $17,750Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2021 to Sep 10, 2026 (5 years).
NUDV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
NUDV vs VYM Performance
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUDV returned +17.45% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, NUDV is up 11.34% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Over three years, NUDV compounded at +14.79% per year against +17.99% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.43% and +12.16% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 13.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for NUDV and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDV charges 0.26% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $4 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDV currently yields 2.07% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
83.9% of NUDV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.6% of VYM's money is in holdings NUDV also owns.
Most of NUDV is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
67 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in NUDV and 603 in VYM, against full books of 86 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 501 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NUDV (66.9% of the fund), and 16 for NUDV that do not appear in VYM (14.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUDV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.03% | 1.93% | 0.10% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.64% | 1.31% | 1.33% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.09% | 1.85% | 0.24% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 2.58% | 1.15% | 1.43% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 2.40% | 1.32% | 1.08% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 2.26% | 1.42% | 0.84% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.41% | 0.97% | 1.44% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 2.16% | 1.10% | 1.06% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 2.01% | 0.74% | 1.27% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.01% | 0.67% | 1.34% |
83.9% of NUDV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDV or VYM?
NUDV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NUDV or VYM?
Over the past year NUDV returned +17.45% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NUDV or VYM?
NUDV has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 13.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NUDV -20.1% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both NUDV and VYM?
NUDV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDV and VYM?
83.9% of NUDV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.6% of VYM's is in holdings NUDV also owns. They hold 67 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in NUDV and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDV or VYM?
NUDV yields 2.07% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NUDV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. NUDV is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.