ONEQ vs VOO
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ONEQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. ONEQ offers more diversification with 700 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONEQ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 898 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.32% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.43% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.24% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.47% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2003 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ONEQ vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ONEQ returned +24.43% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, ONEQ is up 14.32% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, ONEQ compounded at +25.24% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.47% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +12.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for ONEQ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONEQ charges 0.21% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $3 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEQ currently yields 0.60% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ONEQ and VOO share 152 holdings out of 1053 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.9% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VOO?
ONEQ has an expense ratio of 0.21% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ONEQ or VOO?
Over the past year ONEQ returned +24.43% vs +22.62% for VOO, so ONEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ONEQ annualized +12.51% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ONEQ or VOO?
ONEQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ONEQ -55.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ONEQ and VOO?
ONEQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ONEQ and VOO?
ONEQ and VOO share 152 common holdings with a 53.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1053 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONEQ or VOO?
ONEQ yields 0.60% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.