OZEM vs VTI
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OZEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OZEM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $63M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.52% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.62% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 21, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
OZEM vs VTI Performance
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OZEM returned +37.62% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, OZEM is down 2.52% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OZEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.6% for OZEM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OZEM charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OZEM currently yields 0.21% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OZEM and VTI share 8 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OZEM or VTI?
OZEM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OZEM or VTI?
Over the past year OZEM returned +37.62% vs +22.39% for VTI, so OZEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OZEM annualized +13.95% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OZEM or VTI?
OZEM has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OZEM -28.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OZEM and VTI?
OZEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OZEM and VTI?
OZEM and VTI share 8 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OZEM or VTI?
OZEM yields 0.21% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.