PCLG vs PLDR
Polen Focus Growth ETF vs Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Which is better, PCLG or PLDR?
PLDR has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. PLDR led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLG | PLDR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $89M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 58 | 56 |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | May 25, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 155 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. PCLG has data through Nov 11, 2026 and PLDR through Jun 9, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLG charges 0.49% per year while PLDR charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $59 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLG currently yields 0.04% against 0.35% for PLDR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 52.2% of PCLG's money is in holdings PLDR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for PLDR, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 235 days apart, PCLG as of Oct 20, 2026 and PLDR as of Feb 27, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 52 in PLDR, against full books of 58 and 56.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PCLG | Weight in PLDR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.35% | 8.17% | 0.82% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.51% | 4.63% | 4.88% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.16% | 4.85% | 1.31% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.68% | 3.58% | 2.10% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 5.94% | 1.78% | 4.16% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 5.07% | 2.53% | 2.54% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 6.07% | 1.46% | 4.61% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.28% | 2.87% | 1.41% |
| LRCXLam Research Corporation | 2.17% | 1.04% | 1.13% |
52.2% of PCLG is already inside PLDR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLG or PLDR?
PCLG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while PLDR charges 0.59%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PCLG and PLDR?
At least 52.2% of PCLG's money is in holdings PLDR also owns. Our book for PLDR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 52 in PLDR.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLG or PLDR?
PCLG yields 0.04% while PLDR yields 0.35%, so PLDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PLDR better than PCLG?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. PLDR led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.