PCLG vs VTI

PCLG vs VTI
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPCLGVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%
AUM$88M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.04%1.07%
Holdings263,543
YTD Return-5.53%+13.14%
1Y Return-7.71%+22.35%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.83%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.01%
Volatility (annualized)-15.3%
Max Drawdown-23.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyPolen CapitalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 30, 2025May 24, 2001

PCLG vs VTI Performance

Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is a ETF from Polen Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PCLG returned -7.71% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, PCLG is down 5.53% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for PCLG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PCLG charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLG currently yields 0.04% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

25.4%overlap

PCLG and VTI share 22 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PCLGWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA6.95%6.32%0.63%
MSFT7.63%3.81%3.82%
AVGO6.88%2.46%4.42%
LLYProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
VProProPro
MAProProPro
NOWProProPro
ORCLProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See the top 10 holdings PCLG shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every position in this table.
Unlock FundXLS Pro$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PCLG or VTI?

PCLG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, PCLG or VTI?

Over the past year PCLG returned -7.71% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between PCLG and VTI?

PCLG and VTI share 22 common holdings with a 25.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, PCLG or VTI?

PCLG yields 0.04% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free