IVV vs PCLG

IVV vs PCLG
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPCLGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.49%
AUM$907.0B$88M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.04%
Holdings50826
YTD Return+12.28%-6.08%
1Y Return+20.94%-8.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.05%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-23.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Polen Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 30, 2025

IVV vs PCLG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is a ETF from Polen Capital. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while PCLG returned -8.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 6.08% for PCLG.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.8% for PCLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.04% for PCLG.

Holdings Overlap

27.8%overlap

IVV and PCLG share 22 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PCLGDifference
NVDA7.76%6.95%0.81%
MSFT4.57%7.63%3.06%
AVGO2.83%6.88%4.05%
AMZNProProPro
LLYProProPro
GOOGProProPro
VProProPro
MAProProPro
NOWProProPro
ORCLProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See the top 10 holdings IVV shares with PCLG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every position in this table.
Unlock FundXLS Pro$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PCLG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PCLG charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or PCLG?

Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -8.25% for PCLG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PCLG?

IVV and PCLG share 22 common holdings with a 27.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PCLG?

IVV yields 1.10% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free