PFOE vs VTI

PFOE vs VTI

Which is better, PFOE or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPFOEVTI
Expense Ratio0.59%0.03%Best
AUM$87M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.21%1.03%
Holdings483,524
YTD Return-11.82%+13.35%Best
1Y Return-+15.92%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.83%
Top 10 Weight53.7%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyPathfinder ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 31, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PFOE vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PFOE vs VTI Performance

Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) is an ETF from Pathfinder ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PFOE is down 11.82% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PFOE charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFOE currently yields 0.21% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

PFOE already in VTI57.9%
VTI already in PFOE6.8%

57.9% of PFOE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.8% of VTI's money is in holdings PFOE also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in PFOE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 48 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PFOE (90.6% of the fund), and 4 for PFOE that do not appear in VTI (16.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PFOEWeight in VTIDifference
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C5.03%2.31%2.72%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.4.20%1.35%2.85%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.5.11%0.42%4.69%
UBERUber Technologies Inc4.92%0.20%4.72%
UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc.4.44%0.52%3.92%
IDXXIdexx Labs4.74%0.06%4.68%
VVisa Inc Class A3.72%0.83%2.89%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc.4.27%0.17%4.10%
MAMastercard Inc3.64%0.63%3.01%
INTUIntuit, Inc.3.90%0.12%3.78%

57.9% of PFOE is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PFOEVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PFOE or VTI?

PFOE has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PFOE and VTI?

57.9% of PFOE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.8% of VTI's is in holdings PFOE also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in PFOE and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, PFOE or VTI?

PFOE yields 0.21% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PFOE?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.