PPH vs VTI
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PPH or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PPH led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PPH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $985M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.92% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.18% | +13.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +32.25%Best | +21.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.91% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.69% | +11.77%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.5%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,617 | $17,443Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 3, 2026 (25.3 years).
PPH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
PPH vs VTI Performance
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PPH returned +32.25% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, PPH is up 13.18% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, PPH compounded at +14.91% per year against +21.10% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.69% and +11.77% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +3.78%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.4% for PPH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.5% for PPH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PPH charges 0.36% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPH currently yields 1.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 62.4% of PPH's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in PPH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 26 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PPH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 19.65% | 1.40% | 18.25% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 9.79% | 0.44% | 9.35% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.40% | 0.84% | 3.56% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 4.91% | 0.16% | 4.75% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.46% | 0.61% | 3.85% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 4.81% | 0.19% | 4.62% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 4.77% | 0.12% | 4.65% |
| CORCencora Inc | 3.75% | 0.07% | 3.68% |
| ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A | 2.16% | 0.04% | 2.12% |
| VTRSViatris Inc. | 1.21% | 0.03% | 1.18% |
62.4% of PPH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PPH or VTI?
PPH has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PPH or VTI?
Over the past year PPH returned +32.25% vs +21.44% for VTI, so PPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), PPH annualized +3.78% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PPH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.4% for PPH. Worst drawdown: PPH -52.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PPH and VTI?
PPH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PPH and VTI?
At least 62.4% of PPH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in PPH and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PPH or VTI?
PPH yields 1.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PPH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PPH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PPH led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.