PPH vs VOO
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PPH or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PPH led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PPH | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $985M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.86% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 26 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.62% | +13.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +28.93%Best | +17.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.33% | +22.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.75% | +13.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Tie | 14.1%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,662 | $18,539Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 72.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 24, 2026 (16 years).
PPH vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
PPH vs VOO Performance
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PPH returned +28.93% while VOO returned +17.37%. Year to date, PPH is up 8.62% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.
Over three years, PPH compounded at +13.33% per year against +22.66% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.75% and +13.14% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.42% annualized vs +8.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PPH and VOO have been equally volatile, both at 14.1% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for PPH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PPH charges 0.36% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPH currently yields 1.86% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
60.4% of PPH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.3% of VOO's money is in holdings PPH also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in PPH and 494 in VOO, against full books of 26 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PPH (94.8% of the fund), and 6 for PPH that do not appear in VOO (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PPH | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 18.70% | 1.41% | 17.29% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 10.97% | 0.50% | 10.47% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.44% | 0.96% | 3.48% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 5.11% | 0.22% | 4.89% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.52% | 0.69% | 3.83% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 4.96% | 0.21% | 4.75% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 4.73% | 0.16% | 4.57% |
| CORCencora Inc | 3.75% | 0.09% | 3.66% |
| ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A | 2.16% | 0.05% | 2.11% |
| VTRSViatris Inc. | 1.10% | 0.03% | 1.07% |
60.4% of PPH is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PPH or VOO?
PPH has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PPH or VOO?
Over the past year PPH returned +28.93% vs +17.37% for VOO, so PPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PPH annualized +8.88% vs +13.42% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PPH or VOO?
PPH and VOO have been equally volatile, both at 14.1% annualized. Worst drawdown: PPH -36.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PPH and VOO?
PPH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PPH and VOO?
60.4% of PPH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.3% of VOO's is in holdings PPH also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in PPH and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PPH or VOO?
PPH yields 1.86% while VOO yields 1.04%, so PPH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PPH?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PPH led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.