QB vs SCHD
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, QB or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QB | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 103 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +15.54% | +25.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.39% | +30.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0%Best | 12.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.5%Best | -4.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,193 | $13,430Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
QB vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
QB vs SCHD Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) is an ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QB returned +19.39% while SCHD returned +30.22%. Year to date, QB is up 15.54% versus a gain of 25.88% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 5.0% for QB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.5% for QB and -4.6% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QB charges 0.58% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $6 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QB currently yields 0.75% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
5.1% of QB's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 21.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings QB also owns.
SCHD and QB share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QB and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 103 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for QB (78.5% of the fund), and 87 for QB that do not appear in SCHD (92.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QB | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.02% | 4.70% | 3.68% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.84% | 3.64% | 2.80% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.05% | 3.13% | 2.08% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.79% | 2.52% | 1.73% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.51% | 2.79% | 2.28% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 0.42% | 2.31% | 1.89% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 0.25% | 1.38% | 1.13% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.20% | 1.00% | 0.80% |
21.5% of SCHD is already inside QB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QB or SCHD?
QB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QB or SCHD?
Over the past year QB returned +19.39% vs +30.22% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QB annualized +17.97% vs +27.86% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QB or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 5.0% for QB. Worst drawdown: QB -3.5% vs SCHD -4.6%.
Should I hold both QB and SCHD?
QB and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QB and SCHD?
21.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings QB also owns. 21.5% of SCHD's is in holdings QB also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QB and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, QB or SCHD?
QB yields 0.75% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than QB?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.