QB vs VYM
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QB | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +15.25% | +15.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.21% | +22.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QB vs VYM Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QB returned +20.21% while VYM returned +22.36%. Year to date, QB is up 15.25% versus a gain of 15.42% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 5.1% for QB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.5% for QB and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QB charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QB currently yields 0.77% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QB and VYM share 28 holdings out of 678 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QB or VYM?
QB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QB or VYM?
Over the past year QB returned +20.21% vs +22.36% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QB annualized +18.67% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QB or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 5.1% for QB. Worst drawdown: QB -3.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QB and VYM?
QB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QB and VYM?
QB and VYM share 28 common holdings with a 15.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 678 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QB or VYM?
QB yields 0.77% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.