QB vs VYM
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QB or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QB | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 307 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +9.56% | +16.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.41% | +18.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0%Best | 10.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.7% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $11,626 | $12,918Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.4 years).
QB vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
QB vs VYM Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QB returned +10.41% while VYM returned +18.97%. Year to date, QB is up 9.56% versus a gain of 16.00% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.3% compared with 7.0% for QB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.7% for QB and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QB charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QB currently yields 0.78% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 18.7% of VYM's money is in holdings QB also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for QB, our book for it lists positions totalling 200.8% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
VYM and QB share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, QB as of Oct 19, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
26 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QB and 602 in VYM, against full books of 307 and 610.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QB | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 6.94% | 4.45% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.82% | 1.76% | 0.06% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.10% | 0.96% | 0.14% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.01% | 0.91% | 0.10% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.99% | 0.86% | 0.13% |
| PEPPepsico Inc | 0.79% | 0.77% | 0.02% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.82% | 0.73% | 0.09% |
| ADIAnalog Devices | 0.82% | 0.71% | 0.11% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.07% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.73% | 0.35% | 0.38% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QB and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QB or VYM?
QB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QB or VYM?
Over the past year QB returned +10.41% vs +18.97% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QB annualized +11.36% vs +20.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QB or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.3% annualized versus 7.0% for QB. Worst drawdown: QB -8.7% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both QB and VYM?
QB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QB and VYM?
At least 18.7% of VYM's money is in holdings QB also owns. Our book for QB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QB and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QB or VYM?
QB yields 0.78% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QB?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.