IVV vs QB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF
Which is better, IVV or QB?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, QB over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.75% |
| Holdings | 508 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.48% | +19.39%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 5.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -3.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,540Best | $12,193 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 24, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
IVV vs QB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while QB returned +19.39%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a gain of 15.54% for QB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 5.0% for QB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -3.5% for QB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QB charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.75% for QB.
Holdings Overlap
54.0% of IVV's money is in holdings QB also owns. 94.7% of QB's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QB is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
87 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 102 in QB, against full books of 508 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for QB that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.0% of the fund), and 395 for IVV that do not appear in QB (44.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 8.55% | 0.48% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 7.45% | 0.43% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 6.04% | 0.35% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 4.47% | 0.63% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 4.78% | 3.15% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 3.16% | 0.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.80% | 0.15% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.91% | 0.52% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 2.72% | 0.82% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 3.40% | 2.24% |
94.7% of QB is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QB charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QB?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs +19.39% for QB, so QB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +20.76% vs +17.97% for QB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 5.0% for QB. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs QB -3.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QB?
IVV and QB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QB?
94.7% of QB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 94.7% of QB's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 87 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 102 in QB.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QB?
IVV yields 1.06% while QB yields 0.75%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, QB over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.