QB vs VTI
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QB or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QB led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 103 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.57%Best | +11.53% |
| 1Y Return | +19.41%Best | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.5%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,190 | $12,482Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 15, 2026 (1.2 years).
QB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
QB vs VTI Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QB returned +19.41% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, QB is up 15.57% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 5.0% for QB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.5% for QB and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QB charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QB currently yields 0.75% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.4% of QB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.5% of VTI's money is in holdings QB also owns.
Most of QB is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
91 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 103 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,059 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QB (49.9% of the fund), and 4 for QB that do not appear in VTI (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.55% | 6.40% | 2.15% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.45% | 6.29% | 1.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.04% | 4.79% | 1.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.47% | 3.65% | 0.82% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.78% | 1.29% | 3.49% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.16% | 2.90% | 0.26% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.80% | 2.56% | 0.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.91% | 2.31% | 0.60% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.40% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 1.70% | 1.02% |
95.4% of QB is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QB or VTI?
QB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QB or VTI?
Over the past year QB returned +19.41% vs +15.74% for VTI, so QB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QB annualized +17.94% vs +20.29% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 5.0% for QB. Worst drawdown: QB -3.5% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both QB and VTI?
QB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QB and VTI?
95.4% of QB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.5% of VTI's is in holdings QB also owns. They hold 91 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QB and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QB or VTI?
QB yields 0.75% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QB led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.