QDIV vs VTI
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QDIV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QDIV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDIV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.55%Best | +14.05% |
| 1Y Return | +16.19% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.79% | +22.65%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.33% | +12.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,919 | $17,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.7%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2018 to Sep 22, 2026 (8.2 years).
QDIV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
QDIV vs VTI Performance
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDIV returned +16.19% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, QDIV is up 14.55% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, QDIV compounded at +11.79% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.33% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.87%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for QDIV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDIV charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDIV currently yields 2.72% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.6% of QDIV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.9% of VTI's money is in holdings QDIV also owns.
Most of QDIV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QDIV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,102 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QDIV (92.5% of the fund), and 0 for QDIV that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QDIV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.02% | 0.89% | 1.13% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.29% | 0.22% | 2.07% |
| TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.0833 | 2.37% | 0.09% | 2.28% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.27% | 0.15% | 2.12% |
| BDXBecton Dickinson And Co. | 2.35% | 0.06% | 2.29% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.23% | 0.18% | 2.05% |
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 2.27% | 0.04% | 2.23% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.10% | 0.20% | 1.90% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 2.28% | 0.02% | 2.26% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.82% | 0.47% | 1.35% |
95.6% of QDIV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDIV or VTI?
QDIV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QDIV or VTI?
Over the past year QDIV returned +16.19% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QDIV annualized +7.87% vs +13.58% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QDIV or VTI?
QDIV has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QDIV -41.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both QDIV and VTI?
QDIV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QDIV and VTI?
95.6% of QDIV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.9% of VTI's is in holdings QDIV also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QDIV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDIV or VTI?
QDIV yields 2.72% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QDIV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QDIV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.