QDIV vs VOO
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDIV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.81% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.55% | +12.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.19% | +20.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.56% | +12.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QDIV vs VOO Performance
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDIV returned +19.36% while VOO returned +20.36%. Year to date, QDIV is up 18.55% versus a gain of 12.13% for VOO.
Over three years, QDIV compounded at +12.19% per year against +20.90% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.56% and +12.59% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for QDIV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDIV charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDIV currently yields 2.81% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QDIV and VOO share 48 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDIV or VOO?
QDIV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDIV or VOO?
Over the past year QDIV returned +19.36% vs +20.36% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QDIV annualized +8.38% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDIV or VOO?
QDIV has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QDIV -41.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QDIV and VOO?
QDIV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QDIV and VOO?
QDIV and VOO share 48 common holdings with a 5.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDIV or VOO?
QDIV yields 2.81% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.