QLD vs VOO
ProShares Ultra QQQ vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QLD or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QLD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $13.8B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 127 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +25.79%Best | +11.98% |
| 1Y Return | +32.30%Best | +16.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.80%Best | +21.19% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.30%Best | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.2% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,207Best | $18,384 |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 14, 2026 (16 years).
QLD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QLD vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QLD returned +32.30% while VOO returned +16.45%. Year to date, QLD is up 25.79% versus a gain of 11.98% for VOO.
Over three years, QLD compounded at +40.80% per year against +21.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +17.30% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QLD has the edge at +33.00% annualized vs +13.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.7% for QLD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLD charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLD currently yields 0.13% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 53.6% of VOO's money is in holdings QLD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QLD, our book for it covers 78.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
85 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QLD and 494 in VOO, against full books of 127 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QLD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.84% | 7.55% | 1.71% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.08% | 7.05% | 1.97% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.12% | 5.36% | 1.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.05% | 4.13% | 1.08% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.16% | 3.24% | 1.08% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.92% | 2.86% | 0.94% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.26% | 1.44% | 1.82% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.00% | 2.62% | 0.62% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.85% | 1.90% | 0.05% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.31% | 1.21% | 1.10% |
53.6% of VOO is already inside QLD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLD or VOO?
QLD has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QLD or VOO?
Over the past year QLD returned +32.30% vs +16.45% for VOO, so QLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), QLD annualized +33.00% vs +13.37% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QLD or VOO?
QLD has been the more volatile fund at 35.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QLD -63.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QLD and VOO?
QLD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QLD and VOO?
At least 53.6% of VOO's money is in holdings QLD also owns. Our book for QLD is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QLD and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLD or VOO?
QLD yields 0.13% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QLD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QLD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.