QQH vs QQQ
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $772M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 93 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.27% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.84% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.29% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.26% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Howard Capital Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 9, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QQH vs QQQ Performance
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is a ETF from Howard Capital Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQH returned +19.84% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, QQH is up 8.27% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, QQH compounded at +22.29% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.26% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQH has the edge at +19.20% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.7% for QQH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.9% for QQH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQH charges 0.98% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $18 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQH currently yields 0.20% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QQH and QQQ share 93 holdings out of 108 unique holdings combined, representing a 75.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQH or QQQ?
QQH has an expense ratio of 0.98% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQH or QQQ?
Over the past year QQH returned +19.84% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQH annualized +19.20% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.7% for QQH. Worst drawdown: QQH -41.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QQH and QQQ?
QQH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQH and QQQ?
QQH and QQQ share 93 common holdings with a 75.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 108 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQH or QQQ?
QQH yields 0.20% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.