IVV vs QQH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.98% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $772M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.20% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 93 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +7.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +18.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +22.04% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +10.57% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -41.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Howard Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 9, 2019 |
IVV vs QQH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is a ETF from Howard Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while QQH returned +18.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 7.75% for QQH.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +22.04% for QQH; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +10.57% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQH has the edge at +19.12% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -41.9% for QQH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQH charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $98 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.20% for QQH.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQH share 90 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQH charges 0.98%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQH?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +18.44% for QQH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +19.12% for QQH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQH?
QQH has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQH -41.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQH?
IVV and QQH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQH?
IVV and QQH share 90 common holdings with a 52.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQH?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQH yields 0.20%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.